Swirly Mein Kopf

Thursday, August 23. 2007

The trustworthy stranger

Digital World

Some friends and I are considering to set up something similar to Steve’s xen-hosting.org. One issue that came up was: “Who get’s to be the main admin and how can we trust him?” At first I found this an odd issue − I’ve never heard anyone considering this when using one of those anonymous virtual server hosting offers.

After all, when you have something valuable to store somewhere, e.g. your family store of gold coins, you’d rather ask your good friends instead of some random stranger. But it seems to be different for information: Imagine you have some valuable piece of information (e.g. your dirty secret from ten years ago) and you had to share it with someone − suddenly the completely anonymous stranger seems to be a better choice than the persons that know you...

I think this effect is also the reason why people are so little troubled by known and unknown facts such as

  • E-mail-communication is open to any one having control over a server “inbetween” you and your recepient.
  • Messages sent over AIM are (or were, it seems), according to the Terms of Services, legally owned by AOL.
  • Google uses the contents of your gmail e-mails to do stuff.

This is just a small part of the list of situations where people give information to some “unknown stranger” that they would probably not give their friends.

Is this way of thought valid? If not, what are good arguments to convince people to be more careful? And under what circumstances would you trust your friend to manage the host machine for your Xen server instance?

Trackbacks


Hvem kan man stole på?
Joachim Breitner skriver i The trustworthy stranger om hvorvidt det er bedst at ens venner eller fuldstændige fremmede har administrator-adgang til ens data og Martin von Haller fortæller om en advokat han overhørte på en togtur mellem Købehnavn o...
Weblog: peter.makholm.net
Tracked: Aug 24, 17:06

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Usually I can check the size of the company to see how trustworthy it is. But how can I check how much I can trust a friend? Even if I can trust him, maybe he overestimates his skills and destroys the server by accident?

If you need another person to share the server with, you can contact me :D
#1 David T. on 2007-08-24 02:38 (Reply)
Sorry for the trackback in danish. Here is a summary in english.

Danish lawyer Martin von Haller, who has strong connections to the open
source world and the IT world in general, blogs about a train trip where
he overheard another lawyers phone conversations concerning business
relations and a wedding he was going to. One of the phrases this phone
talking lawyer uses is "don't tell this to anybody" while ten strangers
is hearing his conversations.

Basically you're both doing the same observations. People are willing to
share some informations to total strangers but not with closer known
people. The value of information is purly subjectiv. Google and the next
generation emerging technologies could change this. As information
becomes more searchable we could have a marked for more private
information, but some people stil finds it anoying if you just do a
google search on them before a meeting. It's is going to be interesting
to see how available private information will be and when the general
public will becoam aware of these changes.
#2 Peter Makholm (Homepage) on 2007-08-26 18:43 (Reply)

Add Comment



To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

 
 
Nach oben